PlainIndex

ETF comparison

AMLP vs IXC

Both Energy.

Alerian MLP ETF · iShares Global Energy ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of AMLP and IXC would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

AMLP only 0.0% Shared 0.0% IXC only 0.0%
In AMLP only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In IXC only
0 positions

Holdings data for AMLP covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for IXC covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

AMLP

Alerian MLP ETF

ALPS · Energy

43 composite / 100
Expense ratio
1.01%
Net assets
$12.61B
TTM yield
7.35%
Top-10 conc.
—
IXC

iShares Global Energy ETF

iShares · Energy

68 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.40%
Net assets
$2.76B
TTM yield
2.72%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

0
Cost
60
58
Tax efficiency
75
100
Liquidity
76
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
AMLP sub-score IXC

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IXC is 61 bps cheaper than AMLP. On a $100,000 position that's about $610/yr more in fees for AMLP.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in AMLP

0 total

Every AMLP position is also held by IXC.

Only in IXC

0 total

Every IXC position is also held by AMLP.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.