PlainIndex

ETF comparison

AOA vs AOK

Both Asset Allocation.

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of AOA and AOK would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

AOA only 0.0% Shared 0.0% AOK only 0.0%
In AOA only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In AOK only
0 positions

Holdings data for AOA covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for AOK covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

AOA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

iShares · Asset Allocation

79 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$3.05B
TTM yield
2.12%
Top-10 conc.
—
AOK

iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF

iShares · Asset Allocation

70 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$755.7M
TTM yield
3.32%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

85
Cost
85
70
Tax efficiency
66
78
Liquidity
51
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
AOA sub-score AOK

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.15% vs 0.15%).

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in AOA

0 total

Every AOA position is also held by AOK.

Only in AOK

0 total

Every AOK position is also held by AOA.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.