ETF comparison
AOK vs AOM
Both Asset Allocation.
iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF · iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Holdings overlap
7 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of AOK and AOM would leave roughly 89.7% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.
Cost difference
Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.15% vs 0.15%).
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with AOK vs AOM.
Top shared holdings
7 shared in total| # | Holding | In AOK | In AOM | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 57.81% | 49.05% | 49.05% |
| 2 | iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 18.05% | 23.83% | 18.05% |
| 3 | iShares Core MSCI International Developed Mkt ETF | 8.76% | 11.56% | 8.76% |
| 4 | iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF | 10.03% | 8.51% | 8.51% |
| 5 | iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.75% | 4.95% | 3.75% |
| 6 | iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.35% | 1.03% |
| 7 | iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.50% | 0.66% | 0.50% |
Only in AOK
0 totalEvery AOK position is also held by AOM.
Only in AOM
0 totalEvery AOM position is also held by AOK.
Open AOK or AOM at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions
matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see
/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.