PlainIndex

ETF comparison

AOM vs AOR

Both Asset Allocation.

iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF · iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of AOM and AOR would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

AOM only 0.0% Shared 0.0% AOR only 0.0%
In AOM only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In AOR only
0 positions

Holdings data for AOM covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for AOR covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

AOM

iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

iShares · Asset Allocation

75 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$1.72B
TTM yield
3.04%
Top-10 conc.
—
AOR

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

iShares · Asset Allocation

80 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$3.48B
TTM yield
2.53%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

85
Cost
85
67
Tax efficiency
69
67
Liquidity
80
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
AOM sub-score AOR

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.15% vs 0.15%).

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in AOM

0 total

Every AOM position is also held by AOR.

Only in AOR

0 total

Every AOR position is also held by AOM.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.