PlainIndex

ETF comparison

COMT vs SLV

Both Commodities.

iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF · iShares Silver Trust

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of COMT and SLV would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

COMT only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SLV only 0.0%
In COMT only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SLV only
0 positions

Holdings data for COMT covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SLV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

COMT

iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF

iShares · Commodities

54 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.48%
Net assets
$1.16B
TTM yield
5.35%
Top-10 conc.
—
SLV

iShares Silver Trust

iShares · Commodities

70 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.50%
Net assets
$35.61B
TTM yield
0.00%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

52
Cost
50
53
Tax efficiency
73
59
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
COMT sub-score SLV

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

COMT is 2 bps cheaper than SLV. On a $100,000 position that's about $20/yr more in fees for SLV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in COMT

0 total

Every COMT position is also held by SLV.

Only in SLV

0 total

Every SLV position is also held by COMT.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.