PlainIndex

ETF comparison

DBC vs SIVR

Both Commodities.

Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of DBC and SIVR would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

DBC only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SIVR only 0.0%
In DBC only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SIVR only
0 positions

Holdings data for DBC covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SIVR covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

DBC

Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund

Invesco · Commodities

42 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.85%
Net assets
$1.89B
TTM yield
2.40%
Top-10 conc.
—
SIVR

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

abrdn · Commodities

76 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.30%
Net assets
$5.06B
TTM yield
0.00%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

15
Cost
70
64
Tax efficiency
73
69
Liquidity
87
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
DBC sub-score SIVR

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SIVR is 55 bps cheaper than DBC. On a $100,000 position that's about $550/yr more in fees for DBC.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in DBC

0 total

Every DBC position is also held by SIVR.

Only in SIVR

0 total

Every SIVR position is also held by DBC.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.