PlainIndex

ETF comparison

EEMV vs SPLV

Both Quality Factor.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EEMV and SPLV would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

EEMV only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SPLV only 0.0%
In EEMV only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SPLV only
0 positions

Holdings data for EEMV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SPLV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

EEMV

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF

iShares · Quality Factor

77 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets
$3.45B
TTM yield
2.41%
Top-10 conc.
—
SPLV

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF

Invesco · Quality Factor

82 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets
$7.23B
TTM yield
2.11%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

75
Cost
75
79
Tax efficiency
80
80
Liquidity
94
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
EEMV sub-score SPLV

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.25% vs 0.25%).

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in EEMV

0 total

Every EEMV position is also held by SPLV.

Only in SPLV

0 total

Every SPLV position is also held by EEMV.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.