PlainIndex

ETF comparison

EFV vs ESGD

Both International Developed.

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EFV and ESGD would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

EFV only 0.0% Shared 0.0% ESGD only 0.0%
In EFV only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In ESGD only
0 positions

Holdings data for EFV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for ESGD covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

EFV

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF

iShares · International Developed

78 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.31%
Net assets
$29.97B
TTM yield
3.83%
Top-10 conc.
—
ESGD

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF

iShares · International Developed

84 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.20%
Net assets
$11.32B
TTM yield
3.39%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

69
Cost
80
69
Tax efficiency
70
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
EFV sub-score ESGD

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

ESGD is 11 bps cheaper than EFV. On a $100,000 position that's about $110/yr more in fees for EFV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in EFV

0 total

Every EFV position is also held by ESGD.

Only in ESGD

0 total

Every ESGD position is also held by EFV.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.