PlainIndex

ETF comparison

ESGU vs SCHK

Both US Total Market.

iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF · Schwab 1000 ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of ESGU and SCHK would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

ESGU only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SCHK only 0.0%
In ESGU only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SCHK only
0 positions

Holdings data for ESGU covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SCHK covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

ESGU

iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF

iShares · US Total Market

90 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$16.58B
TTM yield
0.97%
Top-10 conc.
—
SCHK

Schwab 1000 ETF

Schwab · US Total Market

92 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$5.27B
TTM yield
1.06%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

85
Cost
97
87
Tax efficiency
87
100
Liquidity
88
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
ESGU sub-score SCHK

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SCHK is 12 bps cheaper than ESGU. On a $100,000 position that's about $120/yr more in fees for ESGU.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in ESGU

0 total

Every ESGU position is also held by SCHK.

Only in SCHK

0 total

Every SCHK position is also held by ESGU.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.