PlainIndex

ETF comparison

EWS vs FEZ

Both International Developed.

iShares MSCI Singapore ETF · State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of EWS and FEZ would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

EWS only 0.0% Shared 0.0% FEZ only 0.0%
In EWS only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In FEZ only
0 positions

Holdings data for EWS covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for FEZ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

EWS

iShares MSCI Singapore ETF

iShares · International Developed

55 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.50%
Net assets
$807.2M
TTM yield
3.91%
Top-10 conc.
—
FEZ

State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF

State Street · International Developed

76 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.29%
Net assets
$4.43B
TTM yield
2.64%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

50
Cost
71
68
Tax efficiency
73
52
Liquidity
85
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
EWS sub-score FEZ

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

FEZ is 21 bps cheaper than EWS. On a $100,000 position that's about $210/yr more in fees for EWS.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in EWS

0 total

Every EWS position is also held by FEZ.

Only in FEZ

0 total

Every FEZ position is also held by EWS.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.