PlainIndex

ETF comparison

FDIS vs IYC

Both Consumer Discretionary.

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF · iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of FDIS and IYC would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

FDIS only 0.0% Shared 0.0% IYC only 0.0%
In FDIS only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In IYC only
0 positions

Holdings data for FDIS covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for IYC covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

FDIS

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF

Fidelity · Consumer Discretionary

82 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.084%
Net assets
$1.77B
TTM yield
0.72%
Top-10 conc.
—
IYC

iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF

iShares · Consumer Discretionary

66 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.38%
Net assets
$1.20B
TTM yield
0.50%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

92
Cost
62
83
Tax efficiency
84
67
Liquidity
60
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
FDIS sub-score IYC

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

FDIS is 30 bps cheaper than IYC. On a $100,000 position that's about $296/yr more in fees for IYC.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in FDIS

0 total

Every FDIS position is also held by IYC.

Only in IYC

0 total

Every IYC position is also held by FDIS.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.