PlainIndex

ETF comparison

FNCL vs KBE

Both Financials.

Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of FNCL and KBE would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

FNCL only 0.0% Shared 0.0% KBE only 0.0%
In FNCL only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In KBE only
0 positions

Holdings data for FNCL covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for KBE covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

FNCL

Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF

Fidelity · Financials

83 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.084%
Net assets
$2.21B
TTM yield
1.65%
Top-10 conc.
—
KBE

State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF

State Street · Financials

68 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.35%
Net assets
$1.49B
TTM yield
2.31%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

92
Cost
65
79
Tax efficiency
77
72
Liquidity
64
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
FNCL sub-score KBE

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

FNCL is 27 bps cheaper than KBE. On a $100,000 position that's about $266/yr more in fees for KBE.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in FNCL

0 total

Every FNCL position is also held by KBE.

Only in KBE

0 total

Every KBE position is also held by FNCL.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.