PlainIndex

ETF comparison

FNDX vs RSP

Both US Large Cap.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of FNDX and RSP would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

FNDX only 0.0% Shared 0.0% RSP only 0.0%
In FNDX only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In RSP only
0 positions

Holdings data for FNDX covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for RSP covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

FNDX

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF

Schwab · US Large Cap

85 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets
$25.91B
TTM yield
1.50%
Top-10 conc.
—
RSP

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Invesco · US Large Cap

87 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.20%
Net assets
$86.40B
TTM yield
1.53%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

75
Cost
80
85
Tax efficiency
85
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
FNDX sub-score RSP

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

RSP is 5 bps cheaper than FNDX. On a $100,000 position that's about $50/yr more in fees for FNDX.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in FNDX

0 total

Every FNDX position is also held by RSP.

Only in RSP

0 total

Every RSP position is also held by FNDX.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.