PlainIndex

ETF comparison

FVD vs RDVY

Both Dividend.

First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund · First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of FVD and RDVY would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

FVD only 0.0% Shared 0.0% RDVY only 0.0%
In FVD only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In RDVY only
0 positions

Holdings data for FVD covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for RDVY covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

FVD

First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund

First Trust · Dividend

63 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.62%
Net assets
$8.18B
TTM yield
2.26%
Top-10 conc.
RDVY

First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF

First Trust · Dividend

72 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.47%
Net assets
$21.95B
TTM yield
0.94%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

38
Cost
53
72
Tax efficiency
77
96
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
FVD sub-score RDVY

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

RDVY is 15 bps cheaper than FVD. On a $100,000 position that's about $150/yr more in fees for FVD.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in FVD

0 total

Every FVD position is also held by RDVY.

Only in RDVY

0 total

Every RDVY position is also held by FVD.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.