PlainIndex

ETF comparison

GDX vs URA

Both Materials.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF · Global X Uranium ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of GDX and URA would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

GDX only 0.0% Shared 0.0% URA only 0.0%
In GDX only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In URA only
0 positions

Holdings data for GDX covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for URA covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

GDX

VanEck Gold Miners ETF

VanEck · Materials

72 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.51%
Net assets
$27.26B
TTM yield
0.72%
Top-10 conc.
—
URA

Global X Uranium ETF

Global X · Materials

59 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.69%
Net assets
$7.81B
TTM yield
3.75%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

49
Cost
31
83
Tax efficiency
71
100
Liquidity
95
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
GDX sub-score URA

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

GDX is 18 bps cheaper than URA. On a $100,000 position that's about $180/yr more in fees for URA.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in GDX

0 total

Every GDX position is also held by URA.

Only in URA

0 total

Every URA position is also held by GDX.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.