PlainIndex

ETF comparison

GDX vs XME

Both Materials.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of GDX and XME would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

GDX only 0.0% Shared 0.0% XME only 0.0%
In GDX only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In XME only
0 positions

Holdings data for GDX covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for XME covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

GDX

VanEck Gold Miners ETF

VanEck · Materials

72 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.51%
Net assets
$27.26B
TTM yield
0.72%
Top-10 conc.
—
XME

State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

State Street · Materials

76 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.35%
Net assets
$5.30B
TTM yield
0.32%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

49
Cost
65
83
Tax efficiency
84
100
Liquidity
88
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
GDX sub-score XME

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

XME is 16 bps cheaper than GDX. On a $100,000 position that's about $160/yr more in fees for GDX.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in GDX

0 total

Every GDX position is also held by XME.

Only in XME

0 total

Every XME position is also held by GDX.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.