PlainIndex

ETF comparison

HDV vs QYLD

Both Dividend.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF · Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of HDV and QYLD would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

HDV only 0.0% Shared 0.0% QYLD only 0.0%
In HDV only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In QYLD only
0 positions

Holdings data for HDV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for QYLD covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

HDV

iShares Core High Dividend ETF

iShares · Dividend

89 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.080%
Net assets
$13.57B
TTM yield
2.88%
Top-10 conc.
—
QYLD

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

Global X · Dividend

59 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.60%
Net assets
$8.33B
TTM yield
11.47%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

92
Cost
40
70
Tax efficiency
51
100
Liquidity
97
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
HDV sub-score QYLD

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

HDV is 52 bps cheaper than QYLD. On a $100,000 position that's about $520/yr more in fees for QYLD.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in HDV

0 total

Every HDV position is also held by QYLD.

Only in QYLD

0 total

Every QYLD position is also held by HDV.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.