PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IAT vs VFH

Both Financials.

iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF · Vanguard Financials Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IAT and VFH would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IAT only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VFH only 0.0%
In IAT only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VFH only
0 positions

Holdings data for IAT covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VFH covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IAT

iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF

iShares · Financials

61 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.38%
Net assets
$625.1M
TTM yield
2.76%
Top-10 conc.
—
VFH

Vanguard Financials Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · Financials

91 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.090%
Net assets
$13.71B
TTM yield
1.52%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

62
Cost
91
75
Tax efficiency
80
48
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IAT sub-score VFH

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

VFH is 29 bps cheaper than IAT. On a $100,000 position that's about $290/yr more in fees for IAT.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IAT

0 total

Every IAT position is also held by VFH.

Only in VFH

0 total

Every VFH position is also held by IAT.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.