PlainIndex

ETF comparison

ICSH vs MBB

Both US Aggregate Bond.

iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF · iShares MBS ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of ICSH and MBB would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

ICSH only 0.0% Shared 0.0% MBB only 0.0%
In ICSH only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In MBB only
0 positions

Holdings data for ICSH covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for MBB covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

ICSH

iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF

iShares · US Aggregate Bond

81 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.080%
Net assets
$7.28B
TTM yield
4.41%
Top-10 conc.
—
MBB

iShares MBS ETF

iShares · US Aggregate Bond

85 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.040%
Net assets
$38.31B
TTM yield
4.23%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

92
Cost
96
44
Tax efficiency
45
94
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
ICSH sub-score MBB

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

MBB is 4 bps cheaper than ICSH. On a $100,000 position that's about $40/yr more in fees for ICSH.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in ICSH

0 total

Every ICSH position is also held by MBB.

Only in MBB

0 total

Every MBB position is also held by ICSH.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.