PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IJH vs SCHY

US Mid Cap vs Dividend.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF · Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IJH and SCHY would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IJH only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SCHY only 0.0%
In IJH only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SCHY only
0 positions

Holdings data for IJH covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SCHY covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IJH

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

iShares · US Mid Cap

94 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.050%
Net assets
$115.69B
TTM yield
1.22%
Top-10 conc.
—
SCHY

Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF

Schwab · Dividend

80 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.080%
Net assets
$2.24B
TTM yield
3.41%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

95
Cost
92
86
Tax efficiency
68
100
Liquidity
72
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IJH sub-score SCHY

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IJH is 3 bps cheaper than SCHY. On a $100,000 position that's about $30/yr more in fees for SCHY.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IJH

0 total

Every IJH position is also held by SCHY.

Only in SCHY

0 total

Every SCHY position is also held by IJH.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.