PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IJJ vs VOT

Both US Mid Cap.

iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF · Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IJJ and VOT would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IJJ only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VOT only 0.0%
In IJJ only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VOT only
0 positions

Holdings data for IJJ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VOT covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IJJ

iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF

iShares · US Mid Cap

87 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.18%
Net assets
$8.52B
TTM yield
1.65%
Top-10 conc.
—
VOT

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · US Mid Cap

95 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.050%
Net assets
$32.22B
TTM yield
0.65%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

82
Cost
95
84
Tax efficiency
88
97
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IJJ sub-score VOT

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

VOT is 13 bps cheaper than IJJ. On a $100,000 position that's about $130/yr more in fees for IJJ.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IJJ

0 total

Every IJJ position is also held by VOT.

Only in VOT

0 total

Every VOT position is also held by IJJ.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.