PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IUSV vs RPV

Both US Value.

iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IUSV and RPV would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IUSV only 0.0% Shared 0.0% RPV only 0.0%
In IUSV only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In RPV only
0 positions

Holdings data for IUSV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for RPV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IUSV

iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF

iShares · US Value

94 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.040%
Net assets
$25.64B
TTM yield
1.71%
Top-10 conc.
—
RPV

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

Invesco · US Value

70 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.35%
Net assets
$1.81B
TTM yield
2.33%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

96
Cost
65
84
Tax efficiency
82
100
Liquidity
68
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IUSV sub-score RPV

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IUSV is 31 bps cheaper than RPV. On a $100,000 position that's about $310/yr more in fees for RPV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IUSV

0 total

Every IUSV position is also held by RPV.

Only in RPV

0 total

Every RPV position is also held by IUSV.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.