PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IVE vs MGV

Both US Value.

iShares S&P 500 Value ETF · Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IVE and MGV would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IVE only 0.0% Shared 0.0% MGV only 0.0%
In IVE only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In MGV only
0 positions

Holdings data for IVE covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for MGV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IVE

iShares S&P 500 Value ETF

iShares · US Value

88 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.18%
Net assets
$49.37B
TTM yield
1.54%
Top-10 conc.
—
MGV

Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Fund

Vanguard · US Value

94 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.050%
Net assets
$12.14B
TTM yield
1.96%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

82
Cost
95
85
Tax efficiency
83
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IVE sub-score MGV

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

MGV is 13 bps cheaper than IVE. On a $100,000 position that's about $130/yr more in fees for IVE.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IVE

0 total

Every IVE position is also held by MGV.

Only in MGV

0 total

Every MGV position is also held by IVE.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.