PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IWX vs PRF

Both US Value.

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IWX and PRF would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IWX only 0.0% Shared 0.0% PRF only 0.0%
In IWX only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In PRF only
0 positions

Holdings data for IWX covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for PRF covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IWX

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF

iShares · US Value

81 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.20%
Net assets
$3.40B
TTM yield
1.53%
Top-10 conc.
—
PRF

Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF

Invesco · US Value

80 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.34%
Net assets
$9.53B
TTM yield
1.43%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

80
Cost
66
85
Tax efficiency
85
80
Liquidity
99
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IWX sub-score PRF

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

IWX is 14 bps cheaper than PRF. On a $100,000 position that's about $140/yr more in fees for PRF.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IWX

0 total

Every IWX position is also held by PRF.

Only in PRF

0 total

Every PRF position is also held by IWX.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.