PlainIndex

ETF comparison

IYR vs SCHH

Both Real Estate.

iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF · Schwab U.S. REIT ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of IYR and SCHH would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

IYR only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SCHH only 0.0%
In IYR only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SCHH only
0 positions

Holdings data for IYR covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SCHH covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

IYR

iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF

iShares · Real Estate

67 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.38%
Net assets
$4.09B
TTM yield
2.19%
Top-10 conc.
—
SCHH

Schwab U.S. REIT ETF

Schwab · Real Estate

86 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.070%
Net assets
$9.93B
TTM yield
2.78%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

62
Cost
93
55
Tax efficiency
53
83
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
IYR sub-score SCHH

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SCHH is 31 bps cheaper than IYR. On a $100,000 position that's about $310/yr more in fees for IYR.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in IYR

0 total

Every IYR position is also held by SCHH.

Only in SCHH

0 total

Every SCHH position is also held by IYR.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.