PlainIndex

ETF comparison

JNK vs SHYG

Both US High Yield Bond.

State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF · iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of JNK and SHYG would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

JNK only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SHYG only 0.0%
In JNK only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SHYG only
0 positions

Holdings data for JNK covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SHYG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

JNK

State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF

State Street · US High Yield Bond

64 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.40%
Net assets
$7.27B
TTM yield
6.59%
Top-10 conc.
—
SHYG

iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

iShares · US High Yield Bond

68 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.30%
Net assets
$7.56B
TTM yield
7.01%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

60
Cost
70
33
Tax efficiency
32
94
Liquidity
95
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
JNK sub-score SHYG

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SHYG is 10 bps cheaper than JNK. On a $100,000 position that's about $100/yr more in fees for JNK.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in JNK

0 total

Every JNK position is also held by SHYG.

Only in SHYG

0 total

Every SHYG position is also held by JNK.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.