PlainIndex

ETF comparison

MOAT vs SPHQ

Both Quality Factor.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of MOAT and SPHQ would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

MOAT only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SPHQ only 0.0%
In MOAT only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SPHQ only
0 positions

Holdings data for MOAT covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SPHQ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

MOAT

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

VanEck · Quality Factor

74 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.46%
Net assets
$11.77B
TTM yield
1.40%
Top-10 conc.
—
SPHQ

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF

Invesco · Quality Factor

89 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$17.26B
TTM yield
1.11%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

54
Cost
85
83
Tax efficiency
84
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
MOAT sub-score SPHQ

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SPHQ is 31 bps cheaper than MOAT. On a $100,000 position that's about $310/yr more in fees for MOAT.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in MOAT

0 total

Every MOAT position is also held by SPHQ.

Only in SPHQ

0 total

Every SPHQ position is also held by MOAT.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.