PlainIndex

ETF comparison

MTUM vs VTV

Momentum Factor vs US Value.

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF · Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of MTUM and VTV would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

MTUM only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VTV only 0.0%
In MTUM only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VTV only
0 positions

Holdings data for MTUM covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VTV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

MTUM

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

iShares · Momentum Factor

89 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$24.18B
TTM yield
0.69%
Top-10 conc.
VTV

Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · US Value

95 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$237.83B
TTM yield
1.92%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

85
Cost
97
83
Tax efficiency
83
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
MTUM sub-score VTV

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

VTV is 12 bps cheaper than MTUM. On a $100,000 position that's about $120/yr more in fees for MTUM.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in MTUM

0 total

Every MTUM position is also held by VTV.

Only in VTV

0 total

Every VTV position is also held by MTUM.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.