PlainIndex

ETF comparison

OEF vs QQQ

US Large Cap vs US Large Cap Growth.

iShares S&P 100 ETF · Invesco QQQ Trust

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of OEF and QQQ would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

OEF only 0.0% Shared 0.0% QQQ only 0.0%
In OEF only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In QQQ only
0 positions

Holdings data for OEF covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for QQQ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

OEF

iShares S&P 100 ETF

iShares · US Large Cap

88 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.20%
Net assets
$19.58B
TTM yield
0.88%
Top-10 conc.
—
QQQ

Invesco QQQ Trust

Invesco · US Large Cap Growth

89 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.18%
Net assets
$440.26B
TTM yield
0.42%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

80
Cost
82
87
Tax efficiency
89
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
OEF sub-score QQQ

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

QQQ is 2 bps cheaper than OEF. On a $100,000 position that's about $20/yr more in fees for OEF.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in OEF

0 total

Every OEF position is also held by QQQ.

Only in QQQ

0 total

Every QQQ position is also held by OEF.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.