PlainIndex

ETF comparison

PAVE vs VGT

Industrials vs Technology.

Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF · Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of PAVE and VGT would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

PAVE only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VGT only 0.0%
In PAVE only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VGT only
0 positions

Holdings data for PAVE covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VGT covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

PAVE

Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF

Global X · Industrials

74 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.47%
Net assets
$13.36B
TTM yield
0.77%
Top-10 conc.
—
VGT

Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · Technology

92 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.090%
Net assets
$146.53B
TTM yield
0.37%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

53
Cost
91
83
Tax efficiency
84
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
PAVE sub-score VGT

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

VGT is 38 bps cheaper than PAVE. On a $100,000 position that's about $380/yr more in fees for PAVE.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in PAVE

0 total

Every PAVE position is also held by VGT.

Only in VGT

0 total

Every VGT position is also held by PAVE.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.