PlainIndex

ETF comparison

PFF vs VRP

Both Preferred Securities.

iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF · Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of PFF and VRP would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

PFF only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VRP only 0.0%
In PFF only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VRP only
0 positions

Holdings data for PFF covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VRP covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

PFF

iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF

iShares · Preferred Securities

67 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.45%
Net assets
$13.93B
TTM yield
5.65%
Top-10 conc.
VRP

Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF

Invesco · Preferred Securities

57 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.50%
Net assets
$2.59B
TTM yield
6.39%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

55
Cost
50
52
Tax efficiency
49
100
Liquidity
74
N/A
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
PFF sub-score VRP

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

PFF is 5 bps cheaper than VRP. On a $100,000 position that's about $50/yr more in fees for VRP.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in PFF

0 total

Every PFF position is also held by VRP.

Only in VRP

0 total

Every VRP position is also held by PFF.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.