PlainIndex

ETF comparison

PFXF vs PGX

Both Preferred Securities.

VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF · Invesco Preferred ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of PFXF and PGX would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

PFXF only 0.0% Shared 0.0% PGX only 0.0%
In PFXF only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In PGX only
0 positions

Holdings data for PFXF covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for PGX covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

PFXF

VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF

VanEck · Preferred Securities

61 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.40%
Net assets
$2.32B
TTM yield
6.31%
Top-10 conc.
—
PGX

Invesco Preferred ETF

Invesco · Preferred Securities

59 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.50%
Net assets
$3.92B
TTM yield
6.16%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

60
Cost
50
49
Tax efficiency
50
72
Liquidity
82
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
PFXF sub-score PGX

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

PFXF is 10 bps cheaper than PGX. On a $100,000 position that's about $100/yr more in fees for PGX.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in PFXF

0 total

Every PFXF position is also held by PGX.

Only in PGX

0 total

Every PGX position is also held by PFXF.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.