PlainIndex

ETF comparison

RWR vs SCHH

Both Real Estate.

State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF · Schwab U.S. REIT ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of RWR and SCHH would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

RWR only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SCHH only 0.0%
In RWR only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SCHH only
0 positions

Holdings data for RWR covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SCHH covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

RWR

State Street SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF

State Street · Real Estate

67 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets
$1.79B
TTM yield
3.40%
Top-10 conc.
—
SCHH

Schwab U.S. REIT ETF

Schwab · Real Estate

86 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.070%
Net assets
$9.93B
TTM yield
2.78%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

75
Cost
93
50
Tax efficiency
53
68
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
RWR sub-score SCHH

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SCHH is 18 bps cheaper than RWR. On a $100,000 position that's about $180/yr more in fees for RWR.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in RWR

0 total

Every RWR position is also held by SCHH.

Only in SCHH

0 total

Every SCHH position is also held by RWR.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.