PlainIndex

ETF comparison

SCHA vs SPLG

US Small Cap vs US Large Cap.

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of SCHA and SPLG would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

SCHA only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SPLG only 0.0%
In SCHA only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SPLG only
0 positions

Holdings data for SCHA covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SPLG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

SCHA

Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF

Schwab · US Small Cap

95 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.040%
Net assets
$22.11B
TTM yield
1.05%
Top-10 conc.
—
SPLG

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

State Street · US Large Cap

96 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.020%
Net assets
$97.33B
TTM yield
1.13%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

96
Cost
98
87
Tax efficiency
86
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
SCHA sub-score SPLG

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SPLG is 2 bps cheaper than SCHA. On a $100,000 position that's about $20/yr more in fees for SCHA.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in SCHA

0 total

Every SCHA position is also held by SPLG.

Only in SPLG

0 total

Every SPLG position is also held by SCHA.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.