PlainIndex

ETF comparison

SCHG vs VONG

Both US Large Cap Growth.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of SCHG and VONG would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

SCHG only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VONG only 0.0%
In SCHG only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VONG only
0 positions

Holdings data for SCHG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VONG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

SCHG

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

Schwab · US Large Cap Growth

96 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.040%
Net assets
$55.63B
TTM yield
0.38%
Top-10 conc.
—
VONG

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · US Large Cap Growth

95 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.060%
Net assets
$50.61B
TTM yield
0.45%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

96
Cost
94
89
Tax efficiency
89
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
SCHG sub-score VONG

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SCHG is 2 bps cheaper than VONG. On a $100,000 position that's about $20/yr more in fees for VONG.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in SCHG

0 total

Every SCHG position is also held by VONG.

Only in VONG

0 total

Every VONG position is also held by SCHG.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.