PlainIndex

ETF comparison

SMH vs SOXX

Both Semiconductors.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of SMH and SOXX would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

SMH only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SOXX only 0.0%
In SMH only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SOXX only
0 positions

Holdings data for SMH covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SOXX covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

VanEck · Semiconductors

80 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.35%
Net assets
$58.79B
TTM yield
0.22%
Top-10 conc.
—
SOXX

iShares Semiconductor ETF

iShares · Semiconductors

80 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.34%
Net assets
$29.57B
TTM yield
0.36%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

65
Cost
66
85
Tax efficiency
84
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
SMH sub-score SOXX

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SOXX is 1 bps cheaper than SMH. On a $100,000 position that's about $10/yr more in fees for SMH.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in SMH

0 total

Every SMH position is also held by SOXX.

Only in SOXX

0 total

Every SOXX position is also held by SMH.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.