PlainIndex

ETF comparison

SPHQ vs USMV

Both Quality Factor.

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of SPHQ and USMV would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

SPHQ only 0.0% Shared 0.0% USMV only 0.0%
In SPHQ only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In USMV only
0 positions

Holdings data for SPHQ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for USMV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

SPHQ

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF

Invesco · Quality Factor

89 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$17.26B
TTM yield
1.11%
Top-10 conc.
—
USMV

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF

iShares · Quality Factor

89 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$22.86B
TTM yield
1.55%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

85
Cost
85
84
Tax efficiency
82
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
SPHQ sub-score USMV

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.15% vs 0.15%).

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in SPHQ

0 total

Every SPHQ position is also held by USMV.

Only in USMV

0 total

Every USMV position is also held by SPHQ.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.