PlainIndex

ETF comparison

SPLG vs SPYD

US Large Cap vs Dividend.

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of SPLG and SPYD would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

SPLG only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SPYD only 0.0%
In SPLG only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SPYD only
0 positions

Holdings data for SPLG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SPYD covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

SPLG

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

State Street · US Large Cap

96 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.020%
Net assets
$97.33B
TTM yield
1.13%
Top-10 conc.
SPYD

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

State Street · Dividend

87 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.070%
Net assets
$7.39B
TTM yield
4.23%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

98
Cost
93
86
Tax efficiency
65
100
Liquidity
94
N/A
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
SPLG sub-score SPYD

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SPLG is 5 bps cheaper than SPYD. On a $100,000 position that's about $50/yr more in fees for SPYD.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in SPLG

0 total

Every SPLG position is also held by SPYD.

Only in SPYD

0 total

Every SPYD position is also held by SPLG.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.