PlainIndex

ETF comparison

SPLV vs SPY

Quality Factor vs US Large Cap.

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF · State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of SPLV and SPY would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

SPLV only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SPY only 0.0%
In SPLV only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SPY only
0 positions

Holdings data for SPLV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SPY covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

SPLV

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF

Invesco · Quality Factor

82 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets
$7.23B
TTM yield
2.11%
Top-10 conc.
—
SPY

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

State Street · US Large Cap

92 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.095%
Net assets
$735.06B
TTM yield
1.03%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

75
Cost
91
80
Tax efficiency
87
94
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
SPLV sub-score SPY

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SPY is 16 bps cheaper than SPLV. On a $100,000 position that's about $156/yr more in fees for SPLV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in SPLV

0 total

Every SPLV position is also held by SPY.

Only in SPY

0 total

Every SPY position is also held by SPLV.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.