PlainIndex

ETF comparison

SPYD vs VIGI

Both Dividend.

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF · Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of SPYD and VIGI would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

SPYD only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VIGI only 0.0%
In SPYD only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VIGI only
0 positions

Holdings data for SPYD covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VIGI covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

SPYD

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF

State Street · Dividend

87 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.070%
Net assets
$7.39B
TTM yield
4.23%
Top-10 conc.
VIGI

Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · Dividend

90 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.070%
Net assets
$9.15B
TTM yield
2.16%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

93
Cost
93
65
Tax efficiency
72
94
Liquidity
98
N/A
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
SPYD sub-score VIGI

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

Expense ratios are effectively identical (0.070% vs 0.070%).

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in SPYD

0 total

Every SPYD position is also held by VIGI.

Only in VIGI

0 total

Every VIGI position is also held by SPYD.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.