PlainIndex

ETF comparison

SPYV vs VTI

US Value vs US Total Market.

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF · Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of SPYV and VTI would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

SPYV only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VTI only 0.0%
In SPYV only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VTI only
0 positions

Holdings data for SPYV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VTI covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

SPYV

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF

State Street · US Value

94 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.040%
Net assets
$33.66B
TTM yield
1.72%
Top-10 conc.
VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · US Total Market

95 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$2.20T
TTM yield
1.06%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

96
Cost
97
84
Tax efficiency
87
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
SPYV sub-score VTI

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

VTI is 1 bps cheaper than SPYV. On a $100,000 position that's about $10/yr more in fees for SPYV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in SPYV

0 total

Every SPYV position is also held by VTI.

Only in VTI

0 total

Every VTI position is also held by SPYV.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.