PlainIndex

ETF comparison

VIOV vs VTWO

Both US Small Cap.

Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund ETF Shares · Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund ETF Shares

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of VIOV and VTWO would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

VIOV only 0.0% Shared 0.0% VTWO only 0.0%
In VIOV only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In VTWO only
0 positions

Holdings data for VIOV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for VTWO covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

VIOV

Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · US Small Cap

82 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.10%
Net assets
$1.80B
TTM yield
1.61%
Top-10 conc.
VTWO

Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund ETF Shares

Vanguard · US Small Cap

94 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.060%
Net assets
$16.58B
TTM yield
1.12%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

90
Cost
94
84
Tax efficiency
86
68
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
VIOV sub-score VTWO

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

VTWO is 4 bps cheaper than VIOV. On a $100,000 position that's about $40/yr more in fees for VIOV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in VIOV

0 total

Every VIOV position is also held by VTWO.

Only in VTWO

0 total

Every VTWO position is also held by VIOV.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.