Skip to main content

Lazy portfolio

Couch Potato Portfolio

Scott Burns, Dallas Morning News, 1991

Two funds, 50/50, US stocks and US bonds, rebalanced once a year. Burns published it as a benchmark for active managers. Most of them still lose to it.

Allocation

  • 50% · US Total Market
  • 50% · US Aggregate Bond

Weighted expense ratio

0.030%

Across the 2 of 2 slices we could price.

Weighted tax efficiency

70

/100, weighted by allocation. Lower in heavy-bond portfolios.

Slices

2

Number of holdings — also the number of lots you rebalance.

Implementation

Weight Role Ticker Score
50% US Total Market VTI 92
50% US Aggregate Bond BND 89
  • VTI · alternates: ITOT
  • BND · alternates: AGG

Editorial take

The Couch Potato is best understood as a teaching portfolio rather than an optimal one. The lack of international exposure leaves it concentrated in a single country's equity market — an unusual choice for anyone who didn't inherit a strong home-country bias.

Try the Couch Potato Portfolio in our tools

Compare the slices

See holdings overlap and cost difference between any two of this portfolio's funds.

Open Couch Potato Portfolio holdings at a brokerage

All 2 slices in this portfolio trade commission-free at major brokerages.

Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.

Curated allocation. The funds listed are how this portfolio would be built using the catalog as it stands today; alternate tickers and notes are flagged inline.

PlainIndex publishes data and editorial commentary — nothing here is personalized investment advice. Read the methodology for how the scores referenced here are computed.