Category
Materials
Mining, chemicals, packaging, paper. Commodity-input-sensitive and globally exposed; small share of total US market cap.
11 funds in the catalog. Scored using methodology v0.5.2.
All Materials funds
| Score | Ticker | Name | AUM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | XLB | State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | $7.78B |
| 79 | VAW | Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF Shares | $4.49B† |
| 71 | XME | State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | $4.09B |
| 70 | GUNR | Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF | $6.84B |
| 70 | FMAT | Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF | $574.0M |
| 67 | GDXJ | VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | $8.37B |
| 66 | GDX | VanEck Gold Miners ETF | $26.25B |
| 66 | PICK | iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | $2.40B |
| 60 | COPX | Global X Copper Miners ETF | $7.25B |
| 53 | URA | Global X Uranium ETF | $5.59B |
| 44 | URNM | Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | $1.84B |
† Whole fund: this ETF is one share class of a fund that also sells mutual-fund shares, and the figure covers all of them. Our sources don't report the ETF class on its own.
Compare within Materials
The closest-held pairs in this category, by holdings overlap. Each side-by-side breaks down shared positions, cost difference, and the full score breakdown.
- FMAT vs VAW 93.6% overlap
- FMAT vs XLB 75.0% overlap
- VAW vs XLB 71.5% overlap
- URA vs URNM 54.6% overlap
- GDX vs GDXJ 36.8% overlap
- COPX vs PICK 27.8% overlap
- VAW vs XME 23.9% overlap
- FMAT vs XME 22.8% overlap
Every other pairing is on the compare hub.