PlainIndex

ETF comparison

ACWV vs SPLV

Both Quality Factor.

iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of ACWV and SPLV would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

ACWV only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SPLV only 0.0%
In ACWV only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SPLV only
0 positions

Holdings data for ACWV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SPLV covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

ACWV

iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF

iShares · Quality Factor

80 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.20%
Net assets
$3.25B
TTM yield
2.05%
Top-10 conc.
—
SPLV

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF

Invesco · Quality Factor

82 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets
$7.23B
TTM yield
2.11%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

80
Cost
75
80
Tax efficiency
80
79
Liquidity
94
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
ACWV sub-score SPLV

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

ACWV is 5 bps cheaper than SPLV. On a $100,000 position that's about $50/yr more in fees for SPLV.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in ACWV

0 total

Every ACWV position is also held by SPLV.

Only in SPLV

0 total

Every SPLV position is also held by ACWV.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.