PlainIndex

ETF comparison

AGG vs PULS

Both US Aggregate Bond.

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF · PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of AGG and PULS would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

AGG only 0.0% Shared 0.0% PULS only 0.0%
In AGG only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In PULS only
0 positions

Holdings data for AGG covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for PULS covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

AGG

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

iShares · US Aggregate Bond

86 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$135.37B
TTM yield
3.95%
Top-10 conc.
—
PULS

PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF

PGIM · US Aggregate Bond

79 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets
$15.70B
TTM yield
5.02%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

97
Cost
85
46
Tax efficiency
42
100
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
AGG sub-score PULS

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

AGG is 12 bps cheaper than PULS. On a $100,000 position that's about $120/yr more in fees for PULS.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in AGG

0 total

Every AGG position is also held by PULS.

Only in PULS

0 total

Every PULS position is also held by AGG.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.