PlainIndex

ETF comparison

AIQ vs MOO

Both Thematic.

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF · VanEck Agribusiness ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of AIQ and MOO would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

AIQ only 0.0% Shared 0.0% MOO only 0.0%
In AIQ only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In MOO only
0 positions

Holdings data for AIQ covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for MOO covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

AIQ

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF

Global X · Thematic

62 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.68%
Net assets
$8.61B
TTM yield
0.17%
Top-10 conc.
—
MOO

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

VanEck · Thematic

55 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.56%
Net assets
$1.16B
TTM yield
2.15%
Top-10 conc.
—

Sub-score comparison

32
Cost
44
77
Tax efficiency
70
97
Liquidity
59
N/A
Concentration
N/A
—
Tracking quality
—
AIQ sub-score MOO

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

MOO is 12 bps cheaper than AIQ. On a $100,000 position that's about $120/yr more in fees for AIQ.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in AIQ

0 total

Every AIQ position is also held by MOO.

Only in MOO

0 total

Every MOO position is also held by AIQ.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.