ETF comparison
ASHR vs AVES
Both International Emerging.
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
Holdings overlap
0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of ASHR and AVES would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Holdings data for ASHR covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.
Holdings data for AVES covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.
Cost difference
AVES is 29 bps cheaper than ASHR. On a $100,000 position that's about $290/yr more in fees for ASHR.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.
Top shared holdings
0 shared in totalNo shared holdings between these funds.
Only in ASHR
0 totalEvery ASHR position is also held by AVES.
Only in AVES
0 totalEvery AVES position is also held by ASHR.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions
matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see
/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.