PlainIndex

ETF comparison

BBAX vs SCHF

Both International Developed.

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF · Schwab International Equity ETF

Holdings overlap

0.0 %

0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of BBAX and SCHF would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.

BBAX only 0.0% Shared 0.0% SCHF only 0.0%
In BBAX only
0 positions
Shared
0 positions
In SCHF only
0 positions

Holdings data for BBAX covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Holdings data for SCHF covers 0.0% of fund weight. The remainder lacks matchable identifiers in the N-PORT filing.

Side by side

BBAX

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF

JPMorgan · International Developed

81 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.19%
Net assets
$6.39B
TTM yield
3.57%
Top-10 conc.
SCHF

Schwab International Equity ETF

Schwab · International Developed

92 composite / 100
Expense ratio
0.030%
Net assets
$62.96B
TTM yield
3.11%
Top-10 conc.

Sub-score comparison

81
Cost
97
70
Tax efficiency
71
92
Liquidity
100
N/A
Concentration
N/A
Tracking quality
BBAX sub-score SCHF

Tracking-quality sub-score is not yet computed for any fund — see methodology for which inputs are live.

Cost difference

SCHF is 16 bps cheaper than BBAX. On a $100,000 position that's about $160/yr more in fees for BBAX.

Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. It compounds over time — we publish a fuller cost-projection calculator on the methodology page.

Top shared holdings

0 shared in total

No shared holdings between these funds.

Only in BBAX

0 total

Every BBAX position is also held by SCHF.

Only in SCHF

0 total

Every SCHF position is also held by BBAX.

Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see /methodology/.

Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.