ETF comparison
BBJP vs EWA
Both International Developed.
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF · iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Holdings overlap
0 positions appear in both funds. Buying equal dollars of BBJP and EWA would leave roughly 0.0% of each dollar exposed to the same underlying securities.
Unmatched is the part of a fund's weight the other fund doesn't match: names only it holds, plus any extra weight it puts in names both funds hold.
Side by side
Sub-score comparison
Tracking quality isn't part of the composite — see what we don't score for why.
Cost difference
BBJP is 31 bps cheaper than EWA. On a $100,000 position that's about $310/yr more in fees for EWA.
Fee figure is the annual expense charged on $100,000. To see how the gap compounds over a multi-decade holding period, open the cost calculator pre-filled with BBJP vs EWA.
Top shared holdings
0 shared in totalNo shared holdings between these funds.
Only in BBJP
173 total- Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. 4.65%
- Toyota Motor Corp. 3.99%
- Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. 3.02%
- Hitachi Ltd. 2.72%
- Tokyo Electron Ltd. 2.72%
- Advantest Corp. 2.64%
- Sony Group Corp. 2.56%
- Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. 2.35%
- SoftBank Group Corp. 2.09%
- Recruit Holdings Co. Ltd. 2.03%
Only in EWA
46 total- BHP GROUP LIMITED 15.69%
- COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 13.76%
- WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION 6.14%
- NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED 5.71%
- ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED 5.30%
- WESFARMERS LIMITED 4.51%
- MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITED 4.31%
- RIO TINTO LIMITED 3.45%
- GOODMAN GROUP 3.22%
- WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 2.89%
Related comparisons
More comparisons with BBJP
More comparisons with EWA
Percentages are holdings overlap with the named fund.
Open BBJP or EWA at a brokerage
Both funds trade commission-free at major US brokerages.
Affiliate links — opening an account through these earns PlainIndex a one-time referral. Scoring is computed before any affiliate consideration; see our methodology and funding disclosure.
Holdings overlap is the sum of min(weight_a, weight_b) over positions
matched on ISIN (CUSIP fallback). Methodology: see
/methodology/.
Comparing two funds doesn't endorse swapping one for the other. Tax-lot history, account type, and personal goals matter — PlainIndex publishes data and methodology, not investment advice.